Hans van Wingerden


My work has spanned many areas over the past 45 years. Partly out of necessity, partly out of need. For this introduction, the need is the most relevant.

Starting out as a realist—after all, during my graduation period, it was the time when the photorealists were breaking through—my work went through various developments. Although I had some success with my photorealistic work (Royal Grant), I found it too labor-intensive, or perhaps I should say too craft-based.

The work process, after all, consisted of the design, which only took a few hours, and the execution, sometimes several weeks or even months. Moreover, interest in this work declined significantly, partly due to the rise of digital photography, so I shifted my focus to other forms of expression—first the new figuration, then geometric abstraction, eventually leading to abstraction that followed only the language and sublimation of the act itself.

These developments certainly did not happen abruptly but had a gradual transition—visible and explainable. I never aimed to follow or felt inspired by the prevailing movements of the time—understandably, as the trends succeeded each other rapidly and were too affect-driven. I followed my own path in my exploration of the image, the concentration of painting, and the obsession with the act itself.

After that period, around 1996, after I had painted together the entire post-war “avant-garde,” everything came together. A working method emerged in which the image gained a structured and conceptual foundation. All techniques I had previously used became secondary—the technical treatment of the material was sometimes not unimportant, but served the meaning.

This conceptual orientation of my work has never left me. I have applied variations of materials whenever an expression required maximum impact. This also led to the inclusion of three-dimensional elements as a new possibility. After salvaging a lot of neon from demolished factory buildings—which otherwise would have ended up in a dumpster—I began using it regularly: neon light as a reinforcing element.

Principles of work In my conceptual work, image or stylistic characteristics do not play an important role. I consider such concepts to be outdated after postmodernism. Images have become the commonplace of mass culture.

Only by providing an image with new codes or context can it escape from them: I borrow images and recompose them. It is about a representation of concepts that are regularly discussed in our contemporary visual world, but through manipulation, contextual alienation and associative reference, they produce a new visual meaning.

Previous
Previous

Christy Chor

Next
Next

Carolanne MacLean